Clicky

BJGP Letter: The evolution of GP identity

28 June 2022

Laura Heath is a GP in Oxford and a Wellcome Doctoral Fellow at Oxford University. She is on Twitter: @laurahheath

Richard Armitage’s article, ‘Is the shift to urgent appointments in general practice what patients really want?’ describes the trade-off between acute, reactive, often remote care and long-term relational and preventative care.1 The article described how the availability of same-day appointment is one metric by which to measure quality of general practice and we have a responsibility to articulate the opportunity cost that providing this service may have on other aspects of care.

Are we clinical providers or clinical supervisors? Data sharers or data stewards? Secondary care helpers, or expert generalists?

Similarly, there are other ‘trade-offs’ that we should reflect on in modern primary care. Are we clinical providers or clinical supervisors? Data sharers or data stewards? Secondary care helpers, or expert generalists?  Here too, if our voice is not heard the ‘trade off’ will be externally decided and unlikely to benefit patient care.

Clinical provider or clinical supervisor?

The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) was introduced in England in 2019 to support the recruitment of 26,000 additional staff into general practice.2 With these new roles come new challenges. What are the boundaries of clinical responsibility? Where is the capacity for supervision, education and training of these new healthcare professionals coming from? And importantly, do patients’ want this? Evidence is limited, but recent research suggested that having additional GPs was associated with greater levels of patient satisfaction, whereas the opposite was true for the addition of other healthcare professionals.3 Without more GPs or funding, GPs will have to reduce clinical time to offset the time required for supervision and debriefing of these new roles.

Data sharers or data stewards?

Primary care teams in the UK curate some of the worlds most detailed and information rich medical records going back decades. During the pandemic, information was accessed more quickly, with less confidentiality safeguards, under the Control of Patient Information Regulations 2002 to control the spread of disease.4 As we are co-creating these datasets with our patients, we have a role to inform our patients about what happens to their data. There is a trade-off between greater data for medical research and population health planning, and patient trust. A complicated legal framework exists, but as co-creators of these datasets, we must reflect on how increased access to the medical record may impact patient disclosure.

Hospital helpers or expert generalists?

With a finite amount of time and resource, any additional activity will result in a reduction elsewhere in the system.

To manage the increasing waiting lists, some trusts have expanded the use of Advice and Guidance services for primary care, with the aim to reduce ‘unnecessary’ referrals.5 Taking on work traditionally located in secondary care may help our hospital colleagues, but will reduce the time available for our core primary care work.  Again, without more GPs or more funding, this is likely to shift patient wait times to primary care.

It is time to realistically reflect on the ‘trade-offs’ of the changes coming to primary care. Supervision of additional healthcare professionals comes with reduced GP clinical time. Greater access to primary care datasets may affect patient trust, and increased delegation of work from secondary care reduces our time as expert generalists. We need to articulate these trade-offs to policy makers. With a finite amount of time and resource, any additional activity will result in a reduction elsewhere in the system. Despite our best efforts, General Practice cannot do it all. 

References

  1. Armitage R. Is the shift to urgent appointments in general practice what patients really want? The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2022;72(716):122.
  2. NHS England. Network Contract Directed Enhanced Service: Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme Guidance. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/network-contract-directed-enhanced-service-additional-roles-reimbursement-scheme-guidance/; 2019.
  3. Gibson J, Francetic I, Spooner S, Checkland K, Sutton M. Primary care workforce composition and population, professional, and system outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners. 2022;72(718):e307-e15.
  4. NHS Digital. Control of patient information (COPI) notice https://digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/coronavirus-covid-19-response-information-governance-hub/control-of-patient-information-copi-notice#:~:text=the%20COPI%20notice-,The%20Secretary%20of%20State%20for%20Health%20and%20Social%20Care%20has,under%20COPI%20for%20COVID%2D192020[
  5. NHS England. Advice and Guidance https://www.england.nhs.uk/elective-care-transformation/best-practice-solutions/advice-and-guidance/

Featured image by Johannes Plenio on Unsplash

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Latest from Opinion

Woke up and smell the coffee!

"While this issue’s Life and Times articles are not especially about race or gender, they are broadly ‘woke'. Mindfulness about the aroma of coffee or the immediacy of a dance extends into practical empathy as talking cures hyperventilation or we prepare patients

Fast food and fast healthcare

Industrial medicine operates on the basis of similar assumptions to fast food and industrial farming, viewing process and outcome as all-important but neglecting context. Ben Hoban explores a metaphor with added bite.

When resilience becomes moral injury

A system that demands that clinicians distance themselves emotionally from patients and then applauds that distance as strength is not cultivating resilience; it is manufacturing moral injury.

Social justice and golden rules

We know that there are some fundamental rights and wrongs in the human world... but It is easier to make good laws than to behave well. David Misselbrook reflects.
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x