Clicky

Bullying during COVID-19: the impact on child health

Richard Armitage is a GP and Clinical Lead affiliated with the Division of Epidemiology & Public Health at the University of Nottingham. He is on Twitter: @drricharmitage

COVID-19 continues to impact heavily on the world’s children, including their education, health, and social life.  Bullying, which harms each of these domains of childhood development, may have substantially increased during the on-going pandemic, compounding further the disproportionate impact of children and young people.

Bullying in childhood is a major public health problem.

Bullying in childhood is a major public health problem that has affected one in three children across countries of all incomes in the preceding month.1  The increased risk of poor health, educational and social outcomes associated with bullying are well recognised in childhood, and are now known to extend into adult life.2,3 In addition to traditional forms including physical, verbal and psychological bullying, cyberbullying represents a relatively new phenomenon in which bullying takes place through digital modalities.

The increased risk of poor health, educational and social outcomes associated with bullying are … now known to extend into adult life.

Children are particularly vulnerable to cyberbully victimisation due to their almost ubiquitous uptake of smartphones and participation in social media.  The increased potential for large audiences and anonymous attacks, coupled with the permanence of posts and reduced adult supervision, render cyberbullying a significant threat to child mental health.  However, at least prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, cyberbullying had a much lower prevalence than, and created very few additional victims beyond, traditional forms of bullying.4

National lockdowns and widespread school closures triggered by COVID-19 substantially increased the online activity of millions of children globally.  Such conditions provided the opportunity for potentially increased rates of cyberbully victimisation while traditional forms of bullying were rendered unfeasible.  In addition to existing traditional methods converting to digital forms, entirely new victims of bullying may have been targeted through elevated cyberbully activity secondary to increased time spent online.  These additional victims may now face bullying in both traditional and digital modalities since schools have reopened worldwide.

Consequently, there now exists a potential burden of childhood bullying that is significantly greater than that prior to COVID-19.  Without meaningful action, this could lead to increased rates of poor health, educational and social outcomes in childhood that endure for decades.

Cooperative learning approaches offer greatest potential for success.

Research is urgently needed to establish the impact of COVID-19 on the prevalence of all forms of childhood bullying, and meaningful interventions installed in anticipation of elevated levels.  These could initially focus on girls, who are at greater risk of cyberbullying, and of the associated poor mental health outcomes, than boys.5 However, traditional bullying is likely to remain the major form associated with such outcomes, meaning bullying prevention programs should not focus solely on digital modalities.  While evidence-based anti-bullying interventions are lacking, cooperative learning approaches offer greatest potential for success, although implementation will be challenging under physical distancing restrictions.6  Finally, health professionals working with children, particularly those in general practice, should be alerted to the potential increased rates of bullying, and the likely impact on child health.

 

References 

  1. UNESCO. Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. 2019. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483 [accessed 12 January 2021]
  2. SE Moore, RE Norman, S Suetani. Consequences of bullying victimization in childhood and adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Psychiatry 22 March 2017; 7(1): 60-76. DOI: 10.5498%2Fwjp.v7.i1.60
  3. AB Klomek, A Sourander, H Elonheimo. Bullying by peers in childhood and effects on psychopathology, suicidality, and criminality in adulthood. The Lancet Psychiatry 01 October 2015; 2(10):930-941. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00223-0
  4. D Wolke, K Lee, A Guy. Cyberbullying: a storm in a teacup? European Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry February 2017; 26: 899–908. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-017-0954-6
  5. AK Przbylski, L Bowes. Cyberbullying and adolescent well-being in England: a population-based cross-sectional study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 01 September 2017; 1(1): 19-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(17)30011-1
  6. MJ Van Ryzin, CJ Roseth. Cooperative Learning in Middle School: A Means to Improve Peer Relations and Reduce Victimization, Bullying, and Related Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology 11 November 2018; 110(8): 1192-1201. DOI:10.1037/edu0000265

 

Featured photo by Morgan Basham on Unsplash

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Previous Story

Exhibition review. Migrants are people. Heart of the Nation: Migration and the Making of the NHS

Next Story

Targeting treatment for depression with Target-D

Latest from Opinion

For Who Do You Serve?

For my attention is elsewhere... Occupied by a mere digital abstraction... The computer between us acting

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Skip to toolbar