“This pandemic, and now the attack on WHO, is going to set countries back decades”. Richard Horton talks through the worrying impact on health systems throughout the world as WHO faces the prospect of losing 20% of its funding. He offers advice on how we can, as doctors, advocate for the WHO and primary care.
The BJGP is the world-leading primary care journal. At BJGP Life we add multi-media comment and opinion for the primary care community.
- Shared grief
- When the social media feed gets there first: apomediation and the modern consultation
- Episode 244: Recurrent UTIs: which non-antibiotic approaches actually work?
- Yonder: Sleep apnoea, persistent physical symptoms, health inequalities by language proficiency, and new-onset diabetes
Latest from Videos
Episode 244: Recurrent UTIs: which non-antibiotic approaches actually work?
In this episode, we discuss the evidence for non-antibiotic treatments for UTI.
Episode 243: Local incentives and general practice: what does the evidence show?
In this episode, we talk to Matt Conroy about the impact of local enhanced incentive schemes.
Episode 242: Diagnosing in the dark: recognising childbirth-related PTSD in general practice
In this episode, we talk about childbirth trauma and the challenges in diagnosing and managing it in general practice.
Episode 241: Does GP income meet expectations? The impact on job satisfaction
In this episode, we talk to Dr Ben Walker about the impact of income on GP job satisfaction.
Episode 240: The NHS Health Check and mortality: do they help people live longer?
In this episode, we talk to Dr Jasjot Saund about the mortality benefit of the NHS health care check.
Richard Horton is right about the crucial role that WHO has in the world. I’ve been privileged to be involved with working with WHO over many years, in relation to contraception and reproductive health matters. My experience has been that it is transparent, inclusive, and very considered in its deliberations. WHO plays a vital role in all countries- not just low income countries. For instance the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use is evidence-based guidance to enables countries to ensure the widest possible, safe use of a health care intervention that saves hundreds of thousands of lives each year and which greatly empowers women’s lives. Importantly America has a history of withholding/withdrawing funding to WHO. Usually, as I suspect now, it to distract from political problems at home form the White House. It is vital that this latest episode is reversed as quickly as possible- for all parts of the healthcare system, including, of course, primary care.
[…] we have a tough row ahead for primary care. One of my UK general practitioner colleagues sent this interview with the editor of the Lancet medical journal about what the loss of US funding means for the World Health […]