Clicky

A pathophysiology of purpose: When the “What” kills the “Why”

Jonathan Sunkersing is a GP and sleep medicine expert dedicated to transforming primary care by tackling the systemic “sleep tax” on both patients and theworkforce. He is on LinkedIN.

 

The red notification dots on my clinical screen are more than just tasks; they are digital signals of what we do. 24 lab reports. 28 discharge summaries. 12 urgent callbacks. In the quiet roar of a Monday morning in General Practice, the sheer volume of the ‘What,’ the metrics, the filing, the relentless throughput, drowns out the  ‘Why.’ I’ve started my day but, by 10am, I have often forgotten why I am even sitting at my desk in the first place.

The ‘Why’ does not have a red notification dot. It doesn’t ping, and it doesn’t demand immediate filing. Ignoring it is perhaps the most dangerous clinical error a doctor can make.

Currently, our healthcare system treats the clinician’s ‘Why,’ the passion for healing and kindness, as an infinite resource. It is not. It is a finite neurochemical state and it is being depleted by the ‘What.’ When we spend our best concentration on navigating unwieldy IT systems, chasing QOF targets and remembering the latest updated guideline, we have very little left for the person sitting in the chair.

The ‘Why’ does not have a red notification dot. It doesn’t ping, and it doesn’t demand immediate filing. Ignoring it is perhaps the most dangerous clinical error a doctor can make.In General Practice, we risk becoming technicians of disease labels…hypertension, insomnia, cancer. These are medical ‘Whats.’ Consider the patient presenting with chronic insomnia. In a system overwhelmed with the ‘What’ the solution was binary: a sleep hygiene leaflet or further prescription for Z-drugs. We previously treated insomnia as a symptom to be suppressed. However, when we look for the “why” we often discover a complex, multi-layered story.

When we explore the story behind the patient, the oft-mentioned ideas, concerns and expectations, we are finally practicing medicine. More importantly, we are replenishing our own reserves and reminding ourselves of our raison d’être. Investigating the “Why” in General Practice is not an add-on to our growing workload, but it is the very thing that makes the workload sustainable.

To emulate the great generalists of the past, we must realise that our value and satisfaction does not lie in how many dots we turn from red to black. It lies in our ability to remain human in a system that prioritises speed and quantity. If we lose the “Why”, we aren’t just exhausted, we are obsolete. We must protect our sense of purpose as the cornerstone of our clinical safety, for, ultimately, they are the same thing.

Featured Photo by Glenn Carstens-Peters on Unsplash

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Latest from Opinion

When resilience becomes moral injury

A system that demands that clinicians distance themselves emotionally from patients and then applauds that distance as strength is not cultivating resilience; it is manufacturing moral injury.

Social justice and golden rules

We know that there are some fundamental rights and wrongs in the human world... but It is easier to make good laws than to behave well. David Misselbrook reflects.

When care feels solitary

The patient and I sat opposite each other. She brought her pain and her questions; I had a responsibility to respond. When little changed over many consultations, I began to feel alone with my own helplessness.

Whilst I am here

Somewhere along this odyssey ... A rumour must have spread ... That doctors know a bit of everything ... From eyelashes to raising the dead
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x