“This pandemic, and now the attack on WHO, is going to set countries back decades”. Richard Horton talks through the worrying impact on health systems throughout the world as WHO faces the prospect of losing 20% of its funding. He offers advice on how we can, as doctors, advocate for the WHO and primary care.
The BJGP is the world-leading primary care journal. At BJGP Life we add multi-media comment and opinion for the primary care community.
- Episode 224: From swabs to urine sampling: Rethinking cervical screening in general practice
- Yonder: emergency care access, hospital rotations in GP training, undergraduate GP placements, communicating test results
- Wonderful and Broken: The Complex Reality Of Primary Care In the United States by Troyen A. Brennan
- Persisting, in spite of everything
Latest from Videos
Episode 224: From swabs to urine sampling: Rethinking cervical screening in general practice
In this episode, we discuss the future of cervical screening and possibilities for urine testing for HPV.
Episode 223: Trust matters – A practice-level look at patient confidence in health professionals
In this episode, we speak to Professor Richard Baker about trust in healthcare professionals in general practice.
Episode 222: Belonging, autonomy and burnout: Why GPs leave
In this episode, we speak to Dr Laura Jefferson about GP turnover and reasons why GPs leave.
Episode 221: BJGP Top 10 research most read and published in 2025
In this episode, we look back at the top 10 most read research papers in the BJGP in 2025.
Episode 220: Safety incidents in prison healthcare: Lessons from critical illness
In this episode, we discuss critical illness and failings in prison health.
Richard Horton is right about the crucial role that WHO has in the world. I’ve been privileged to be involved with working with WHO over many years, in relation to contraception and reproductive health matters. My experience has been that it is transparent, inclusive, and very considered in its deliberations. WHO plays a vital role in all countries- not just low income countries. For instance the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use is evidence-based guidance to enables countries to ensure the widest possible, safe use of a health care intervention that saves hundreds of thousands of lives each year and which greatly empowers women’s lives. Importantly America has a history of withholding/withdrawing funding to WHO. Usually, as I suspect now, it to distract from political problems at home form the White House. It is vital that this latest episode is reversed as quickly as possible- for all parts of the healthcare system, including, of course, primary care.
[…] we have a tough row ahead for primary care. One of my UK general practitioner colleagues sent this interview with the editor of the Lancet medical journal about what the loss of US funding means for the World Health […]