Clicky

Why face-to-face still saves lives

15 December 2025

Edoardo Cervoni is a GP in Merseyside, England, with a background in ENT and a long-standing fascination with how people heal, not just biologically, but through relationships, attentiveness, and continuity.

IImagine this: It is the the early morning, first appointment of the day, you find yourself staring at the door after the patient leaves and thinking: we are sleepwalking into danger.

A man in his late fifties books a face-to-face appointment for upper back pain. You would not normally feel comfortable assessing thoracic pain remotely and today reminds you why.

As he sits down and adjusts his collar, you notice a small, pigmented lesion tucked high behind the helix of his left ear — a place few people ever see clearly, and one he himself has never thought to photograph, mention, or inspect. It looks irregular. He had no idea it was there.

You manage his pain but also arrange an urgent cancer referral. The lesion, you later learn, is melanoma in situ. Its position, difficult access, and subtle spread mean he now faces a more extensive excision than might have been required months earlier.*

This is not just an “incidental finding.” It is the irreplaceable value of physical presence — the quiet, unglamorous diagnostic safety net that underpins the entire craft of general practice.

This is not just an “incidental finding.” It is the irreplaceable value of physical presence — the quiet, unglamorous diagnostic safety net that underpins the entire craft of general practice.

Yet the 2025/26 GP contract and accompanying guidance on digitally enabled triage make online tools the required first point of contact for all core hours. Practices failing to comply face financial and contractual consequences.1 The message is clear: remote first, face-to-face only when necessary.

We are told these systems are safe, but no publicly available evidence has yet demonstrated that a mandated digital-first model reliably identifies or safely triages patients with skin lesions, neck lumps, weight loss, abnormal gaits, subtle neurological signs, or concerns that only become apparent when a person walks into the room. Much of what we diagnose is not what the patient planned to discuss.

But general practice is not primarily populated by the young and well.

Although official guidance states that patients may request face-to-face appointments,2 in practice many platforms are configured — and some commercial providers openly market — design features that steer patients away from physical attendance, marking such requests as “inappropriate” or requiring justification. What was once the norm is reframed as an exception.

Remote consulting is excellent for repeat prescriptions, routine results, straightforward infections in the young and well, and selected mental health follow-ups. But general practice is not primarily populated by the young and well. It is a world of the elderly, the multimorbid, the uncertain, the embarrassed, and those who lack the clinical vocabulary to describe what matters most.

Some diagnoses — and some harms — are only visible when the patient is physically present.

Until robust, real-world evidence shows that a mandated digital-first model does not delay cancer diagnoses, widen inequalities, or increase avoidable harm, I will continue to insist that face-to-face remains the gold standard for any new problem, any evolving concern in patients over 50, and for all young children.

Because some things are still only visible when the patient walks through the door.

*Author’s note: whilst this case is fictional and does not relate to any one specific individual, it does derive from the author’s clinical experience and insight.

Deputy editor’s note – see further on the theme of remote consultation safety:

  1. https://bjgplife.com/mitigating-safety-incidents-in-remote-consultations-insights-from-new-research/
  2. https://bjgplife.com/remote-consultations-convenience-for-some-barriers-for-others/
  3. https://bjgplife.com/telephone-consultations-do-not-form-lasting-memories/

References

  1. NHS England. Changes to the GP contract in 2025/26. February 2025. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/changes-to-the-gp-contract-in-2025-26/ [accessed 30/11/25]
  2. NHS England. Digitally enabled triage. Version 2.2, 28 March 2025. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/digitally-enabled-triage/ [accessed 30/11/25]

Featured photo by Miryam León on Unsplash.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Dave
Dave
9 months ago

Superb and totally true

Latest from Opinion

Woke up and smell the coffee!

"While this issue’s Life and Times articles are not especially about race or gender, they are broadly ‘woke'. Mindfulness about the aroma of coffee or the immediacy of a dance extends into practical empathy as talking cures hyperventilation or we prepare patients

Fast food and fast healthcare

Industrial medicine operates on the basis of similar assumptions to fast food and industrial farming, viewing process and outcome as all-important but neglecting context. Ben Hoban explores a metaphor with added bite.

When resilience becomes moral injury

A system that demands that clinicians distance themselves emotionally from patients and then applauds that distance as strength is not cultivating resilience; it is manufacturing moral injury.

Social justice and golden rules

We know that there are some fundamental rights and wrongs in the human world... but It is easier to make good laws than to behave well. David Misselbrook reflects.

When care feels solitary

The patient and I sat opposite each other. She brought her pain and her questions; I had a responsibility to respond. When little changed over many consultations, I began to feel alone with my own helplessness.
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x